Comments

gfolandiya soset

Nice site !

fff

pvlxm uwmzvqk gjmrzketb ltdyoupi uawlmgct bvzcw tfolgji

Hysterical? This is major league bad news. We're talking about potential mega-death. Nice to see your sensitive side ZIo. : - (

O please stop being hysterical. These are LOW yield tactical nukes.

Pat, I agree, let's wait and see, the so-called deadlines and "point of no returns" which are given by the pro-war movement are not very credible, one might even say that they are completely arbitrary, I don't know if some of youn remember how March was supposedly going to be "the point of no return?" Well, last time I checked it's April now and since the international community fialed to respond to the fear mongering, they have made June the NEW point of return (how is it possible to postpone a "point of no return?)...and if the international community doesn't buy the fear mongering this time I guess December will be the new point of no return...and so on...and so on. Catch my drift? The point of no return is years ahead and the doom scenarios come from those who are biased to the bone.

Top analysts have estimated that the time needed for the completion of a nuclear bomb (even the smaller ones) is ten years. The question remains: Is confronting Iran NOW better than the threat of a nuclear armed Iran in ten years or so? Peronally I doubt whether the current regime willl survive the ten years needed to complete a nuclear bomb, Lots can change in ten yaers, and if the nuclear ficlities/bombs fall into the hands of reformist Iranians such as Reza Shah Jr., that's fine with me. I say: let's wait and don't rush things.

Excellent one, thanks. For years we were bombarded with the thought that rogue states, communist states, or terrorist groups were going to use the nuke and that the LAST nation in the world to even bring up the nuclear option would be the US, how ironic that the US is now the frst to break the taboo,

Add Comment